R (on the application of W) v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWHC 1147 (Admin)
The Cs were all severely disabled adults living in Birmingham. D decided to confine the caring support it provided to a more limited range of people. The Cs sought...
07717 721204 | keen@oldsquare.co.uk
The Cs were all severely disabled adults living in Birmingham. D decided to confine the caring support it provided to a more limited range of people. The Cs sought...
The Cs were users of a service (LEAS) which provided free advice on various matters to the local community. D made a decision which interrupted the funding of the...
Cs claimed that D’s decision to restructure its library services was taken without due regard to the public sector equality duty (“PSED”). The Administrative Court ruled that D’s decision...
Cs were two severely disabled adults receiving community care services from D. D decided to reduce its provision of community care. Cs sought judicial review and argued that D...
Cs were students who aspired to study at university. They sought to challenge by way of JR D’s decision to increase the maximum amount which universities were permitted to...
C5 were recipients of social care services from D. They sought to challenge D’s budget-setting and consultation processes as it affected those services. Cs argued that D had failed...
Cs, who were residents of the D local authorities, sought judicial review of decisions to withdraw funding from their local public libraries on the grounds that Ds had failed...
The Defendants were Samantha Norton (SN) who is a disabled child, and her parents Mr and Mrs Norton. Mr Norton lost his job and was unable to keep paying...
C had a visual impairment. He challenged the guidance that D had devised to be used in the design and specification of tactile paving in its Borough. The challenge...
Please call Spencer on 07717 721204 to discuss your needs.
Alternatively, please email keen@oldsquare.co.uk or use our contact form to get in touch.
© 2024 Spencer Keen