Eastern and Coastal Kent PCT v Grey UKEAT/0454/08
The ET found that R was not entitled to rely on the knowledge defence in DDA 1995, s.3 because it knew or could be expected to know of C’s disability . R appealed.
07717 721204 | keen@oldsquare.co.uk
The ET found that R was not entitled to rely on the knowledge defence in DDA 1995, s.3 because it knew or could be expected to know of C’s disability . R appealed.
C’s mental impairment had been recognised but mislabelled by R. C had been dismissed under R’s absence policy. C brought claims for disability-related discrimination and failure to make reasonable...
R’s Occupational Health department (OH) had consistently maintained that despite C’s medical condition (stress) he was not disabled. The ET found that R did not have actual or constructive...
Please call Spencer on 07717 721204 to discuss your needs.
Alternatively, please email keen@oldsquare.co.uk or use our contact form to get in touch.
© 2025 Spencer Keen